The Varied Responses to Jesus
John 3:22-5:37
Class led by Tom Scott
Jesus’ Baptizing Ministry
3:22-4:3
Aim of the writer of John is to give John the Baptist a prominent role but clearly of that of a forerunner.
Jesus' and John the Baptist's ministries are shown as overlapping-this is unique to the book of John. In Mark 1:14 we see that Jesus’ ministry does not begin until after John the Baptist’s arrest. The overlapping of the ministries heightens the contrast between the two ministries.
People were leaving John the Baptist’s ministry to follow Jesus. How did John the Baptist react?
- John the Baptist reiterates his role as the forerunner.
- Said that if followers were going to Jesus, it was because God wanted them to.
- Used imagery of Jesus as the bridegroom, John the Baptist as friend of the bridegroom and Israel as the bride. In Old Testament Israel is seen as the bride to God (the bridegroom). As Son of God, Jesus can be seen as the bridegroom. Friend of the bridegroom played a critical role in a Jewish wedding. Made all of the arrangements, invited the guests, organized the wedding and allowed only the bridegroom enter the wedding chamber. This imagery would have reinforced the picture of John the Baptist as the forerunner to Jesus’ ministry.
Verses 3:31-36
These verses might be from John the Baptist, but more likely they are from the writer of John.
Main Points:
- Jesus is, above all, from God.
- What Jesus talks about is based on first hand witness from God.
- Because Jesus alone knows God, only through him can we know God.
- Jesus has a “full Measure” of the Spirit, not a “certain measure”. With this Jesus has perfect knowledge of the Spirit.
- The choice is ours, believe in the Son and have eternal life.
The Woman of Samaria
John 4:1-42
This story is unique to John. The use of wordplay is similar to the conversation with Nicodemus.
Jesus had to pass through Samaria to get to Galilee.
Why did Jesus leave Judea? Probably wanted to avoid the controversy of competition with John.
Jacob’s well was on the property purchased by Jacob and deeded to Joseph. Joseph is buried there (Joshua 24:32).
The Samaritans and Jews hated each other.
- In 720 BC Assyrians invaded Samaria and captured most of its people (Kings 17:6). The remnant intermarried and drifted away from Judaism.
- After the Babylonian exile, the Jews returned to rebuild the temple. The Samaritans offered to help but were rebuffed. They held a grudge.
- Samaritans established an alternative place of worship on Mount Gerizim, a place that the Jews from Judea captured and sacked in 129 BC.
In addition to being a Samaritan, Jesus spoke to a woman. Strict Rabbis did not greet a woman in public.
Double meaning of the term “living water”; living water is water from a stream or other free flowing source versus still water from a well. Running (living) water was considered far superior to still water for both drinking and purification rites.
The woman does not understand that Jesus is not talking about actual water.
4:10-26
The woman points out that Jesus has no bucket and invokes the name of Jacob. Could Jesus do better than Jacob?
Jews often spoke of a “thirst” of the soul for God; the thirst could be quenched by living water of the Spirit. In any case, the woman took Jesus’ words literally.
The woman asks for the living water. In response, Jesus abruptly changes the nature of the conversation. Up until this point it was probably a lighthearted conversation. The woman is obviously, at least at first, not intimidated by Jesus. By asking her about her husband, Jesus forces the woman to look at herself.
While the woman came face to face with her sin, she did not know where to worship. The mountain or in Jerusalem? This question is posed to Jesus, but Jesus takes the conversation to yet another level. While acknowledging the Jews have the right idea in focusing the worship on Jerusalem, Jesus shows her that he is the way to salvation.
In verse 23 “worship the Father in Spirit and truth” shows that God is not confined to things or places. Both Jewish and Samaritan worship practices are transitory. This leaves open the complete reconciliation between Jews and Samaritans.
4:27-30
Why didn’t the disciples question Jesus about talking to a Samaritan women? At this point, the disciples probably have learned to watch as Jesus conducts his ministry.
Why did the woman leave her bucket? Probably meant to return soon or was in a rush to spread the good news.
Note: Editor's follow-up resources for further introspection here and here.
4:31-34
Same pattern of conversation as shown in other parts of John. Jesus says something that is misunderstood then the true meaning is revealed.
Jesus is perfectly obedient to God.
John 4:35-38
Two ideas:
- There is an opportunity to “reap” the harvest that Jesus has sown.
- There is a challenge to evangelize and sow what others will reap.
John 4:39-42
v. 42 is the key verse; Jesus is not just a prophet or good listener or role model, Jesus is the Savior of the World (the whole world, not just the Jewish or Samaritan world).
Healing the Officials Son 4:43-54
This passage has parallel versions in Matthew and Luke. Instead of an official (probably of Herod’s court) in Matthew and Luke he is a Centurion. And, instead of a son in the synoptic gospels it is a slave/servant of the Centurion.
This second sign is linked back to the first sign (the wedding in Cana) as the location, Cana, is the same.
Verse 44 represents a slight problem as Jesus is actually well received in his hometown (verse 45). Possible explanations are:
- The verse was placed out of context.
- It is used in an ironic sense.
- The verse is not about geographic origins but spiritual ones. That is, Jesus is rejected by those that worship in Jerusalem. This would link the verse back to the conversation with the Samaritan woman.
Verse 48: Is this said in a negative (these people don’t seem to understand) or a positive way (if I show them “signs”, belief will be able to take root)? Likely that this is meant in the positive sense. After Jesus says this, the official reaffirms his faith by showing that he truly believes that Jesus can heal his son.
This is pretty much a straight up healing story, but when linked with the next healing incident (see below) the two passages create a powerful understanding of God’s power to heal.
Healing on the Sabbath 5:1-18
Jesus tends to return to Jerusalem for festivals. The festival mentioned here could be Pentecost (late Spring) or it could be the festival of Tabernacles (autumn). These two festivals along with Passover were the main Jewish festivals.
This healing is similar to the healing of the paralytics in Mark 2:11, Matthew 9:7 and Luke 5:24.
Verse 6: Jesus first asks if the man wants to be healed. The paralytic then seems to launch into complaints about how his life is inconvenienced by others and he gives the impression that he would be satisfied if Jesus could somehow rearrange things to make his condition a little easier. He never actually says he wishes to be healed. Jesus takes him to a much higher level by actually healing him. Did Jesus do this to provoke the authorities (because the man never actually said he wanted to be healed)? Perhaps, but it also shows the power of God to raise our expectations to a higher level. The combined lessons of the past two healing stories (the officials son and the paralytic) could include the following observations:
- Faith plays a crucial role, even if the faith is a little weak and needs reinforcement.
- The power of God to heal through Jesus is not bound by physical presence - both the Centurion’s servant and the officials son were healed “long distance” by Jesus.
- Our desire to be healed can play a major role in the healing process. The paralytic and the demonic (see Luke 8:26-39) passages both point to a willingness by us at times to accept a certain situation and a change in that situation, even if it is for the better, is sometimes not welcomed. For example, the people in the town where the demonic lived were frightened by Jesus’ healing and asked him to leave. They had learned to live with the actions of the demonic and were frightened by what a change in the status quo might mean. In a similar way, the paralytic in John had to look beyond his current situation to see the way to a better life through Christ.
The Authority and Witness to Jesus John 5:19-47
These passages appear to be a monologue as there is no response to what Jesus says. In that sense it could be a literary device used to “wrap up” some basic theology that Jesus has expressed.
In these passages three main claims are made:
- The Son is sent from the Father; as such, Jesus’ work is directly related to and perfectly consistent with what the Father wishes. Jesus receives power and authority from God. Jesus argues that while He is subordinate to God, He does act as God’s designated agent on earth. By making the argument that He is subordinate to God, Jesus is able to blunt the charge by the Pharisees that He is equal with God (leaving the false impression that Jesus would be a competing God). The basic point though is: opposition to Jesus is in fact opposition to God.
- The Son has received authority to execute judgment. Judgment is the prerogative of God and this prerogative is given to the Son by God. Judgment is to express God’s will. The Son of Man is linked to future judgment (Mark 13:24-27)
- There is ample testimony as to who Jesus is; failure to acknowledge that reality is not a failure of information but a spiritual failure.
- There is testimony of John the Baptist
- There are the “signs” that represent the work that God gave Jesus to do.
- There is the testimony of the scriptures.
Tom Scott